-
hihoze1 said...
If the Big12 doesn't see the strategic value in raiding the ACC for FSU and Clemson then they are welcoming the destruction of their own conference at a later date. The B12 needs to strike now to add a southeastern footprint for their recently announced SEC v B12 championship. If the B12 overlaps the SEC as the SEC now overlaps the B12 they become perfect partners. A weakened ACC also allows both the SEC and B12 to add whoever they want and keep the entire South Eastern, West Mississippi areas all to themselves. Anyone in TX or OK who can't see this is blinded by emotions.
-
POTFI66 said...
Being from OK, I really don't think there are very many people "in power" in Oklahoma who DON'T want Clemson and FSU ... He includes Bob Stoops, but Bob doesn't shy away from competition ... just check their OCC year in and year out to see that.
Now, Texas, is a different story. As you will soon realize, they don't like ANYTHING that doesn't completely tilt the field for THEM in some way. They HATE competition ... and would love any situation that gives them an "easier" shot at the MNC game ... So, I can see UT being afraid of adding FSU and Clemson and using the "dilution" story to cover-up their REAL fears ...
This post was edited by InsightTexas on 5/28/2012 at 11:22 AM
InsightTexas ●
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1175 votes total - (346)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
Rivver
- 5 stars Rating: 82
4183 votes total - Banned User
- (12351)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CF247
- 5 stars Rating: 95
852 votes total - Cory Fravel
- (3441)
- 14 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
PistolChad said...
Thanks for the info, but I think your Pitt info is dead wrong. I would count that one up to "wishful thinking" by WVU people. I don't see a single scenario where Pitt would be invited to the Big XII if other ACC schools would accept an invitation - including Miami. In fact the ONLY 2 ACC schools that Pitt would get the nod over would be Wake Forest and Boston College. Any other ACC school would be more attractive to the Big XII. Louisville would be more favorable to the Big XII than Pitt as well.
-
VaHorn said...
ut755, you are either obtuse or naive. The tier 1 contract expires in 2016 and talks are currently underway with ESPN to extend that contract. That is where the substantial increase in revenue is likely to occur. This is a completely different situation than the SEC or the ACC faced when they added teams. They had to reprice and existing long-term contact (expiring in 2024 in the SEC's case). The tier 2 contract with Fox will most certainly be repriced to avoid dilution. There will likely be an increase in the per team payout from that contract as well because adding two teams increases the tier 2 inventory. Whether adding FSU/Clemson will increase the per team payout from the rumored $20 million to the rumored $25 million remains to be seen, but it will not be dilutive. Saying that the increased travel costs from a championship game will eat up any additional revenue from that game is just silly talk.
76-37-5
-
Mokasthunder said...
Don't let UT755 comments give you a false opinion of how the Big 12 views Texas.... That is a typical post by a horn fan that feels the entire Big12 should be grateful for Texas to allow the other schools to play in the same conference as them. I can assure you, OU and OSU will not vote with Texas just because... OU knows that Texas cares about nothing outside of helping itself. OU and OSU would have left for the PAC 12 last year if the PAC 12 would have taken them. OU had an offer 2 years ago to join the SEC, but insisted that OSU be allowed to come with them (SEC said no thanks to OSU)... Texas was dead set against TCU joining the Big12, because they didn't want added competition in the State. No other school voted with Texas on that one..
Bottom line is this, Texas could care less if additional schools are added to the conference to gain an additional 2-5 million dollars and makes the conference stronger as a whole. they feel that way because they just got that 15-20 million a year Longhorn network contract.. They hit the jackpot, so why make the Big 12 harder just for pocket change (in their mind). Texas could rarely win the Big 12 as is was, why make it tougher when you make more money than everyone else anyways!!
As an OU fan, I want the conference to be on par with the SEC as the best football conference out there... I would love for Clemson and Florida State yo be welcomed into the Big 12, that would be step in the right direction!!!
76-37-5
-
CF247
- 5 stars Rating: 95
852 votes total - Cory Fravel
- (3441)
- 14 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
ut755 said...
If by naive you mean that Dave Brown (ESPN) telling me to my face that they aren't repricing tier 1 and Chirs Plonsky and Deloss Dodds saying the same thing, then I guess so. Texas and OU have their own tier 3 deals and won't be part of a conference tier 3 package any time soon so that really leaves tier 2 and Fox. Fox has no contractual obligation to reprice the contract. The SEC just added the state of Missouri and Texas and didn't get a new deal, what makes you think the Big 12 will? Unless the TV networks have a complete brain fart like ESPN did with the LHN, then I doubt it happens.
This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by HoopsCoach on 5/28/2012 at 10:47 PM
-
ut755 said...
If by naive you mean that Dave Brown (ESPN) telling me to my face that they aren't repricing tier 1 and Chirs Plonsky and Deloss Dodds saying the same thing, then I guess so. Texas and OU have their own tier 3 deals and won't be part of a conference tier 3 package any time soon so that really leaves tier 2 and Fox. Fox has no contractual obligation to reprice the contract. The SEC just added the state of Missouri and Texas and didn't get a new deal, what makes you think the Big 12 will? Unless the TV networks have a complete brain fart like ESPN did with the LHN, then I doubt it happens.
This post has been edited 4 times, most recently by Rivver on 5/28/2012 at 11:26 PM
Rivver
- 5 stars Rating: 82
4183 votes total - Banned User
- (12351)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
ut755 said...
If by naive you mean that Dave Brown (ESPN) telling me to my face that they aren't repricing tier 1 and Chirs Plonsky and Deloss Dodds saying the same thing, then I guess so. Texas and OU have their own tier 3 deals and won't be part of a conference tier 3 package any time soon so that really leaves tier 2 and Fox. Fox has no contractual obligation to reprice the contract. The SEC just added the state of Missouri and Texas and didn't get a new deal, what makes you think the Big 12 will? Unless the TV networks have a complete brain fart like ESPN did with the LHN, then I doubt it happens.
This post was edited by VaHorn on 5/29/2012 at 12:25 AM
-
ut755 said...
If by naive you mean that Dave Brown (ESPN) telling me to my face that they aren't repricing tier 1 and Chirs Plonsky and Deloss Dodds saying the same thing, then I guess so. Texas and OU have their own tier 3 deals and won't be part of a conference tier 3 package any time soon so that really leaves tier 2 and Fox. Fox has no contractual obligation to reprice the contract. The SEC just added the state of Missouri and Texas and didn't get a new deal, what makes you think the Big 12 will? Unless the TV networks have a complete brain fart like ESPN did with the LHN, then I doubt it happens.
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Pages: 1 | 2 | Refresh



Sunday's Clemson Big 12 Update. GT, Miami and ND included