Online Now 170

Cemetery Hill

The place for Tiger fans to talk football, basketball and recruiting

On this Board 59
Record: 2484 (7/31/2012)

Online now 210
Record: 3605 (4/12/2012)

Reply

Sunday's Clemson Big 12 Update. GT, Miami and ND included

  • Don't let UT755 comments give you a false opinion of how the Big 12 views Texas.... That is a typical post by a horn fan that feels the entire Big12 should be grateful for Texas to allow the other schools to play in the same conference as them. I can assure you, OU and OSU will not vote with Texas just because... OU knows that Texas cares about nothing outside of helping itself. OU and OSU would have left for the PAC 12 last year if the PAC 12 would have taken them. OU had an offer 2 years ago to join the SEC, but insisted that OSU be allowed to come with them (SEC said no thanks to OSU)... Texas was dead set against TCU joining the Big12, because they didn't want added competition in the State. No other school voted with Texas on that one..

    Bottom line is this, Texas could care less if additional schools are added to
    the conference to gain an additional 2-5 million dollars and makes the conference stronger as a whole. they feel that way because they just got that 15-20 million a year Longhorn network contract.. They hit the jackpot, so why make the Big 12 harder just for pocket change (in their mind). Texas could rarely win the Big 12 as is was, why make it tougher when you make more money than everyone else anyways!!

    As an OU fan, I want the conference to be on par with the SEC as the best football conference out there... I would love for Clemson and Florida State yo be welcomed into the Big 12, that would be step in the right direction!!!

    This post has been edited 5 times, most recently by Mokasthunder on 5/28/2012 at 3:31 PM

    Mokasthunder

  • hihoze1 said...

    If the Big12 doesn't see the strategic value in raiding the ACC for FSU and Clemson then they are welcoming the destruction of their own conference at a later date. The B12 needs to strike now to add a southeastern footprint for their recently announced SEC v B12 championship. If the B12 overlaps the SEC as the SEC now overlaps the B12 they become perfect partners. A weakened ACC also allows both the SEC and B12 to add whoever they want and keep the entire South Eastern, West Mississippi areas all to themselves. Anyone in TX or OK who can't see this is blinded by emotions.

    Being from OK, I really don't think there are very many people "in power" in Oklahoma who DON'T want Clemson and FSU ... He includes Bob Stoops, but Bob doesn't shy away from competition ... just check their OCC year in and year out to see that.

    Now, Texas, is a different story. As you will soon realize, they don't like ANYTHING that doesn't completely tilt the field for THEM in some way. They HATE competition ... and would love any situation that gives them an "easier" shot at the MNC game ... So, I can see UT being afraid of adding FSU and Clemson and using the "dilution" story to cover-up their REAL fears ...

    POTFI66

  • POTFI66 said...

    Being from OK, I really don't think there are very many people "in power" in Oklahoma who DON'T want Clemson and FSU ... He includes Bob Stoops, but Bob doesn't shy away from competition ... just check their OCC year in and year out to see that.

    Now, Texas, is a different story. As you will soon realize, they don't like ANYTHING that doesn't completely tilt the field for THEM in some way. They HATE competition ... and would love any situation that gives them an "easier" shot at the MNC game ... So, I can see UT being afraid of adding FSU and Clemson and using the "dilution" story to cover-up their REAL fears ...

    God, I hate agreeing with an OU fan about anything but Dodds and Mack Brown are both gutless wonders when it comes to realignment and competition in general and that is why they very seldom win championships. UT755 has a gift for spreading their fecklessness for all the world to see and "dilution" is just a cover for cowardice. OU has been exploiting their inept "easy road to championships" leadership for years. Hopefully Dodds will retire soon and UT will hire an AD who is committed to winning championships. Mack Brown will not stay around long if championships become the first priority.

    This post was edited by InsightTexas on 5/28/2012 at 11:22 AM

    InsightTexas

  • ZeroU and aggy fans talking trash about Texas? I am completely shocked.

    Rivver

  • Doubtful they go to the B10 with stem cell research being a hot button for them.

    Cory Fravel www.clemson.247sports.com Twitter @CFravel247 Clemson 247Sports

    CF247

  • PistolChad said...

    Thanks for the info, but I think your Pitt info is dead wrong. I would count that one up to "wishful thinking" by WVU people. I don't see a single scenario where Pitt would be invited to the Big XII if other ACC schools would accept an invitation - including Miami. In fact the ONLY 2 ACC schools that Pitt would get the nod over would be Wake Forest and Boston College. Any other ACC school would be more attractive to the Big XII. Louisville would be more favorable to the Big XII than Pitt as well.

    For the record, most WVU fans DON"T want Pitt in the Big 12. Just go read our message boards if you question it.

    As far as what will happen, I don't truly know. I do know the Big 12 money dwarfs the ACC with the additions.

    Ideally, I would like to see ND, Clemson and FSU for sure. Then try to make a run for VT 1st and after that, a toss up with NCST or GT. As soon as the first domino falls, most ACC schools will be scrambling to find a new home. Heck, as soon as Clemson and FSU leaves, we might as well refer the ACC as BIg East version 4.0

    signature image

    indyrckstar

  • Rivver said...

    ZeroU and aggy fans talking trash about Texas? I am completely shocked.

    It won't take long for the Clemson fan base to start talking trash about you guys once they get in the Conference... lol

    Mokasthunder

  • I think there is some truth in your post about UT, but only as it pertains to the CCG. Since we have tried to take you to every conference that we looked into, we either don't view you as competition, or your arguement has some holes in it.

    I also think UT was in favor of adding TCU. They provide one more game in DFW where parents can drive to watch their kids play. Helps us shore up the top in state recruits, especially those in DFW. TCU is not competition for recruits and never have been.

    HoopsCoach

  • How can Clemson & FSU be concerned about the stigma of being in the ACC but not be concerned about the backlash from joining the Big 12?

    They already have stacked teams. The ACC will not poof into thin air.

    Bottom line: It really must be about the money.

    This post was edited by Chris_topher on 5/28/2012 at 7:15 PM

    Chris_topher

  • VaHorn said...

    ut755, you are either obtuse or naive. The tier 1 contract expires in 2016 and talks are currently underway with ESPN to extend that contract. That is where the substantial increase in revenue is likely to occur. This is a completely different situation than the SEC or the ACC faced when they added teams. They had to reprice and existing long-term contact (expiring in 2024 in the SEC's case). The tier 2 contract with Fox will most certainly be repriced to avoid dilution. There will likely be an increase in the per team payout from that contract as well because adding two teams increases the tier 2 inventory. Whether adding FSU/Clemson will increase the per team payout from the rumored $20 million to the rumored $25 million remains to be seen, but it will not be dilutive. Saying that the increased travel costs from a championship game will eat up any additional revenue from that game is just silly talk.

    If by naive you mean that Dave Brown (ESPN) telling me to my face that they aren't repricing tier 1 and Chirs Plonsky and Deloss Dodds saying the same thing, then I guess so. Texas and OU have their own tier 3 deals and won't be part of a conference tier 3 package any time soon so that really leaves tier 2 and Fox. Fox has no contractual obligation to reprice the contract. The SEC just added the state of Missouri and Texas and didn't get a new deal, what makes you think the Big 12 will? Unless the TV networks have a complete brain fart like ESPN did with the LHN, then I doubt it happens.

    76-37-5

    ut755

  • Mokasthunder said...

    Don't let UT755 comments give you a false opinion of how the Big 12 views Texas.... That is a typical post by a horn fan that feels the entire Big12 should be grateful for Texas to allow the other schools to play in the same conference as them. I can assure you, OU and OSU will not vote with Texas just because... OU knows that Texas cares about nothing outside of helping itself. OU and OSU would have left for the PAC 12 last year if the PAC 12 would have taken them. OU had an offer 2 years ago to join the SEC, but insisted that OSU be allowed to come with them (SEC said no thanks to OSU)... Texas was dead set against TCU joining the Big12, because they didn't want added competition in the State. No other school voted with Texas on that one..

    Bottom line is this, Texas could care less if additional schools are added to the conference to gain an additional 2-5 million dollars and makes the conference stronger as a whole. they feel that way because they just got that 15-20 million a year Longhorn network contract.. They hit the jackpot, so why make the Big 12 harder just for pocket change (in their mind). Texas could rarely win the Big 12 as is was, why make it tougher when you make more money than everyone else anyways!!

    As an OU fan, I want the conference to be on par with the SEC as the best football conference out there... I would love for Clemson and Florida State yo be welcomed into the Big 12, that would be step in the right direction!!!

    OU is a weird deal now, you have the AD going one way and the President going another. I am still confident that OSU and Tech will vote with Texas. If Boren listens to his AD and his HFC then OU probably will as well.

    76-37-5

    ut755

  • Ok here is the wierd POV that puts me at odds with a lot of fans in the Big 12 and elsewhere. The landscape of college football is changing and I think for the better. The big change coming is a playoff system and the end of the BCS. The longer term changes are going to be an expanded playoff and the end of the bowl games as we currently know them. While the playoffs are small (4 teams), playing in a huge ferociously tough conference makes it more likely you won't run the table and get in the final four. Smaller conferences with an easier path to the final four make more sense under this system.

    I understand a fans desire to see a parade of great programs every week during the season. I also know that statistically your odds worsen as the league expands with more good teams. Your odds also get worse if there is a championship game.

    To make one last point, I don't think ND is going to be pushed by the playoffs. Most Big schools don't want the conference champion model +1 right now. They are supporting 4 at large bids. My sample size for saying this is hearing it first or second hand from a couple of coaches and 2 ADs. Just to add logic to it, If you were in a conference that doesn't get an automatic bid, would you vote for a deal that excludes you?

    76-37-5

    ut755

  • CF247 said...

    Texas is posturing here. They are all for this and adding Clemson and FSU likely puts the money at $25 mil per team, plus B12 cg and third tier.

    ND is a separate issue. When ND decides it's then a matter of. Who 14 is

    You are so wrong. Texas is all for more money. If by adding Clemson and FSU it can make them more money then they are all for it. If the money doesn't come through then neither will the votes. See my other posts about money.

    76-37-5

    ut755

  • There's nothing that points to Texas not wanting Clemson and FSU. Yes they are posturing. Keep in mind adding these two takes a little power away by adding new votes to the pot.

    Cory Fravel www.clemson.247sports.com Twitter @CFravel247 Clemson 247Sports

    CF247

  • ut755 said...

    If by naive you mean that Dave Brown (ESPN) telling me to my face that they aren't repricing tier 1 and Chirs Plonsky and Deloss Dodds saying the same thing, then I guess so. Texas and OU have their own tier 3 deals and won't be part of a conference tier 3 package any time soon so that really leaves tier 2 and Fox. Fox has no contractual obligation to reprice the contract. The SEC just added the state of Missouri and Texas and didn't get a new deal, what makes you think the Big 12 will? Unless the TV networks have a complete brain fart like ESPN did with the LHN, then I doubt it happens.

    So Dave Brown told you, who don't matter in the grand scheme of things, that ESPN wasn't going to add to a deal that hasn't been signed yet? I'm sorry but I'm calling Bullshit.

    If ESPN doesn't add to the deal then the Big 12 shouldn't sign the extension and tell ESPN that they will be taking the contract, with FSU and Clemson, to the open market in 2016. I'm sure NBC would like to bid on it. Especially if it looks like they may be losing ND. Fox would be interested as well.

    It makes no sense for ESPN and Fox to not add to it. ESPN b/c not doing so may cost them the contract, and Fox because it brings in the Florida and South Carolina markets that they aren't in at all right now.

    You also point to the SEC contract without mentioning the ACC contract which just went from $12 million to $17 million with the addition of Syracuse and Pitt. I know it's staggered, but there was compensation for their additions. Saying the Big 12 won't when they are actually adding 2 really strong programs, with fans that actually watch, is ridiculous.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by HoopsCoach on 5/28/2012 at 10:47 PM

    HoopsCoach

  • Fsu is far from a regional school. We are no ND but our national TV rankings, even after a decade of mediocrity are top tier. FSU can deliver the Florida market to the big XII as well.as open up the state for the big XII to recruit on equal footing with the SEC. ND is the top prize for any conference to get, they get mote tv sets than anyone, but FSU would be a prize for any conference to get. Clemson is a solid program but make no mistake......FSU is the acc team the big XII wants.

    GG30023

  • ut755 said...

    If by naive you mean that Dave Brown (ESPN) telling me to my face that they aren't repricing tier 1 and Chirs Plonsky and Deloss Dodds saying the same thing, then I guess so. Texas and OU have their own tier 3 deals and won't be part of a conference tier 3 package any time soon so that really leaves tier 2 and Fox. Fox has no contractual obligation to reprice the contract. The SEC just added the state of Missouri and Texas and didn't get a new deal, what makes you think the Big 12 will? Unless the TV networks have a complete brain fart like ESPN did with the LHN, then I doubt it happens.

    It is actually funny how wrong you are on just about every point.

    This post has been edited 4 times, most recently by Rivver on 5/28/2012 at 11:26 PM

    Rivver

  • ut755 said...

    If by naive you mean that Dave Brown (ESPN) telling me to my face that they aren't repricing tier 1 and Chirs Plonsky and Deloss Dodds saying the same thing, then I guess so. Texas and OU have their own tier 3 deals and won't be part of a conference tier 3 package any time soon so that really leaves tier 2 and Fox. Fox has no contractual obligation to reprice the contract. The SEC just added the state of Missouri and Texas and didn't get a new deal, what makes you think the Big 12 will? Unless the TV networks have a complete brain fart like ESPN did with the LHN, then I doubt it happens.

    I am beginning to believe that you are an idiot. No one is talking about repricing tear 1. The tier 1 contract expires in 2016. Rather than wait until that date to negotiate a new contract ESPN is negotiating now. you don't have to speak to Dave Brown to understand that basic fact. You posted on the Longhorn board that since the SEC got such a lucrative deal by adding A&M and Missouri, Texas would not support an addition to the Big 12 that didn't give a similar big payoff to the primary deal. After I posted how completely wrong you were, you seem to be changing the drivel that you spout on a dime.

    This post was edited by VaHorn on 5/29/2012 at 12:25 AM

    VaHorn

  • ut755 said...

    If by naive you mean that Dave Brown (ESPN) telling me to my face that they aren't repricing tier 1 and Chirs Plonsky and Deloss Dodds saying the same thing, then I guess so. Texas and OU have their own tier 3 deals and won't be part of a conference tier 3 package any time soon so that really leaves tier 2 and Fox. Fox has no contractual obligation to reprice the contract. The SEC just added the state of Missouri and Texas and didn't get a new deal, what makes you think the Big 12 will? Unless the TV networks have a complete brain fart like ESPN did with the LHN, then I doubt it happens.

    You do realize that the Big 12 TV deal has yet to be signed, right? The Tier 1 numbers will be very favorable once expansion is complete. There is no finalization until then.

    Each team will have the right to negotiate their own Tier 3 rights under the new Big 12 deal.

    The SEC is currently negotiating their new TV deal. It's coming. They will be getting more money.

    signature image

    Tim Matyaszek | Clemson 247Sports | Twitter: @Tim_Matty247

    Tim_Matty